Posted: 31 Jul 2007, 09:18
Betul pak, under cambered dg KF dibawah = takik bawah.
Flying Bemo dg berat 700 gr cuman perlu runway 2 mtr buat lift off
Flying Bemo dg berat 700 gr cuman perlu runway 2 mtr buat lift off
iwan21 wrote:Takik bawah lebih stabil pak utk terbang pelan, tapi susah diajak ngebut (drag lebih gede katanya), kalo takik atas enggak stabil saat terbang pelan (maunya geyal- geyol terus, walau udah dikalain dg wash-out), tapi stabil di terbang rada cepet.
Om Adhe tinggal pilih mau yg mana .
Makasih om gbnya udah diresize, kasihani saya yg masih dial-up, enggak bisa liat gbnya neh???
dickeroo wrote:My name is Dick Kline, and I'm the inventor of the Kline-Fogleman airfoil which I created over fourty years ago. It has been a long and hard struggle to get people to accept my design because it doesn't fit in with present understanding of how aerodynamics works. I am very interested to hear if you have flown the Flying Truck and how well does it fly? Have you taken any videos of it in the air? If not, can you? Perhaps you could post it on YouTube. If you are able to fly it and it does fly well, it does tell me a lot about the lifting capacity of the KF airfoil. You know that the center of gravity should be further back than it would be on a conventional airfoil. Have you seen the long thread of the KF airfoil on the RC Groups?
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=558321
Redblur wrote:yup di luar mereka nga percayai KF
di sini KF adalah budaya aero hehehe
Indo uda maju dooong