Arducopter APM 2.5 with 2.9.1b firmware

[ipin17]

mantep om randy, itu frame diy ato beli jadi?

saya mau share juga, tapi board pake clone, rctimer arduflyer 2.5


motor sunnysky 980 kv, esc rctimer 30a simonk, prop apc 10x47, lipo 2200mah 3s 2 biji dipararel jadi 4400mah, mode stabilize dan alt hold pake pid standar dah ok, gps hold awalnya msh ngedrift diatas 2m, setelah diulik hbs 2 batt sdh lumayan anteng, msh ngedrift tp dibawah 1m radius dgn kondisi berangin, ntar diulik lagi belakangan[
URL=http://s731.photobucket.com/user/ipin17_aero/media/IMG00093-20130708-1558.jpg.html][/URL]



besok mau nyoba ambil foto/video pake gopro dgn mounting bawaannya, moga2 gak jello

[randy 1203]

mantep om randy, itu frame diy ato beli jadi?

saya mau share juga, tapi board pake clone, rctimer arduflyer 2.5


motor sunnysky 980 kv, esc rctimer 30a simonk, prop apc 10x47, lipo 2200mah 3s 2 biji dipararel jadi 4400mah, mode stabilize dan alt hold pake pid standar dah ok, gps hold awalnya msh ngedrift diatas 2m, setelah diulik hbs 2 batt sdh lumayan anteng, msh ngedrift tp dibawah 1m radius dgn kondisi berangin, ntar diulik lagi belakangan[
URL=http://s731.photobucket.com/user/ipin17_aero/media/IMG00093-20130708-1558.jpg.html][/URL]



besok mau nyoba ambil foto/video pake gopro dgn mounting bawaannya, moga2 gak jello

frame nya DIY pak suhu..

wah manteb bgt tuh
batrenya ga nahan

kalo gps nya di ganti sama UBLOX LEA-6H gimana yah..

share terus perkembangan APM di sini suhu..

kmaren abis crash nih
pas RTH motor tiba tiba lost power ke 4 nya..

langsung jatuh
untuk di bawah nya alang alang semua

perediksi saya sih masalah tegangan
harus pake bec external

soalnya pas di mode loiter poshold
sudah ok
pas mode rth
langsung ke ganggu

mohon pengarahan pak suhu

[randy 1203]

ini settingan saya

[randy 1203]

[randy 1203]

[randy 1203]

setelah blackbox di identifikasi akhirnya dapat di simpulkan masalah crash kemarin

thanks novrizal @ DIYDRONES.COM

[zaki]

in iperbandingan NAZA dan APM ..
saya ga ngerti bahasanya hehehhe ( translet aja di mbah gogel )

Naza M vs. APM 2

Posted by John Dell on November 27, 2012 at 10:32am in ArduCopter 2.x (multicopter)
View Discussions

Had a chance to compare the Naza M to AMP 2 this weekend and wanted to share the experience.

The comparison was done on two similarly sized custom built quads at ~24" span running the same props, motors, PDU and ESCs. The Naza quad had a Go Pro and Fat Shark FPV 5.8Ghz Transmitter and weighted in at about 3.1 Lbs. The APM Quad (mine) had no additional equipment besides a Sonar and it weighed about 2.75 Lbs.

In general both performed very well with a nod going to the Naza in Loiter, RTL and auto landing due to what appears to be a better GPS. Clearly APM has auto mode and Naza does not.. for the price the APM appears to be a solid value.

Stable Mode

As expected both quads were equally stable with no real noticeable difference in stability. The only big difference was NO TUNING on the Naza... it just worked out of the box.

Loiter

The Naza quad had a noticeable difference in loiter stability and accuracy. Granted my quad my not be tuned perfectly but the Naza held its position more accurately and with less twitching in the wind to do so. The Naza's corrections to the wind seemed to be invisible.. where the APM corrections were noticeable in both pitch and prop noise.



RTL

We did a RTL comparison taking off from the same spot and flying about 100 yards away at about 35 feet. The Naza returned to the exact spot of take off. APM got within 10 feet (see below).



Auto Landing

Testing the auto landing during RTL..... the Naza descended from 35 feet in what appeared to be about 5 foot increments. It was a very controlled decent. It landed perfectly on home and shutoff. As mentioned the APM quad hit the launch point within 10 feet. Its decent to landing was steadily and constant. When it touched down it then proceeded to skip around on the ground and went another 10 feet from its landing point before shutting down.

AutoPilot

The Naza has no autopilot. I finally got all the gremlins out of my APM and flew several successful missions which was very cool.

[ipin17]

setelah blackbox di identifikasi akhirnya dapat di simpulkan masalah crash kemarin

thanks novrizal @ DIYDRONES.COM

Maap klo boleh tau kesimpulan penyebab crash nya apa yah ???, klo ngeliat log saja apa sudah keliatan?

[randy 1203]

setelah blackbox di identifikasi akhirnya dapat di simpulkan masalah crash kemarin

thanks novrizal @ DIYDRONES.COM

Maap klo boleh tau kesimpulan penyebab crash nya apa yah ???, klo ngeliat log saja apa sudah keliatan?

biru itu nav roll
ping nav pitch

mereka sudah memberikan perintah dengan baik
kepada controller
namun saat controller memerintahkan pergerakan ke esc
perhatikan roll dan pitch hijau dan merah
kemungkinan ada ketidak baikan kinerja ESC..
makanya ESC cuttoff sendiri

[randy 1203]

in iperbandingan NAZA dan APM ..
saya ga ngerti bahasanya hehehhe ( translet aja di mbah gogel )

Naza M vs. APM 2

Posted by John Dell on November 27, 2012 at 10:32am in ArduCopter 2.x (multicopter)
View Discussions

Had a chance to compare the Naza M to AMP 2 this weekend and wanted to share the experience.

The comparison was done on two similarly sized custom built quads at ~24" span running the same props, motors, PDU and ESCs. The Naza quad had a Go Pro and Fat Shark FPV 5.8Ghz Transmitter and weighted in at about 3.1 Lbs. The APM Quad (mine) had no additional equipment besides a Sonar and it weighed about 2.75 Lbs.

In general both performed very well with a nod going to the Naza in Loiter, RTL and auto landing due to what appears to be a better GPS. Clearly APM has auto mode and Naza does not.. for the price the APM appears to be a solid value.

Stable Mode

As expected both quads were equally stable with no real noticeable difference in stability. The only big difference was NO TUNING on the Naza... it just worked out of the box.

Loiter

The Naza quad had a noticeable difference in loiter stability and accuracy. Granted my quad my not be tuned perfectly but the Naza held its position more accurately and with less twitching in the wind to do so. The Naza's corrections to the wind seemed to be invisible.. where the APM corrections were noticeable in both pitch and prop noise.



RTL

We did a RTL comparison taking off from the same spot and flying about 100 yards away at about 35 feet. The Naza returned to the exact spot of take off. APM got within 10 feet (see below).



Auto Landing

Testing the auto landing during RTL..... the Naza descended from 35 feet in what appeared to be about 5 foot increments. It was a very controlled decent. It landed perfectly on home and shutoff. As mentioned the APM quad hit the launch point within 10 feet. Its decent to landing was steadily and constant. When it touched down it then proceeded to skip around on the ground and went another 10 feet from its landing point before shutting down.

AutoPilot

The Naza has no autopilot. I finally got all the gremlins out of my APM and flew several successful missions which was very cool.

sama seperti halnya manusia

sama sama punya kekurangan dan sama sama punya kelebihan

penjelasan yg menarik suhu zaki